Market Breakout Clears Path to December Highs With Buybacks, Q4 Earnings Support

January Back To Positive

, we noted that while closely watching how the full month of January will turn out, we did generate a positive return during the first five trading days.

“As of Wednesday, which concluded the first five trading days of January, that market did generate a positive return, rising about 0.62%”

As discussed, that was the first of two “January Indicators” that have historically, on average, set the tone for the year.

“Since 1950, the has logged net gains during the first five days of the year 47 times. Of those 47 instances, the index ended the year up in 39 of them. That’s an 83% success rate for the first five-day theory. However, don’t get too excited. Of the 74 completed years since 1950, the S&P 500 has logged a full-year gain 73% of the time. That is likely because stocks are rising as the growth of the global economy continues despite the occasional stumble.”

However, following the first five days, the market stumbled to test support at the 100-DMA. As we noted in last week’s newsletter:

“Amost every sector and market, except for Healthcare and Energy, are deeply oversold. This suggests that we will likely see a decent market rally over the next week to rebalance portfolio risks. A weaker-than-expected inflation print or other soft economic data will likely provide the catalysts for the rally.”

Such is precisely what happened with the technical bounce in the market following Wednesday’s . As of 11 a.m. CST Friday, the market broke above several resistance levels, including the 20 and 50-DMA and the downtrend resistance from the December highs. That technical bounce and break of the downtrend clears the way for a potential retest of those market highs. Furthermore, on the bullish side of the ledger, that technical bounce has reversed the MACD “sell signal” and improved overall relative strength, which should support a rally into next week.

While the recent rally is a positive, we are not likely past the recent increase in volatility. There remain numerous concerns ahead for the market, but in the near term, markets will be supported by the return of share buybacks as we progress further into the Q4 earnings season. Such was a point I made Friday morning on “X.”

“Speaking of share buybacks, in today’s trading update I published the following two charts showing the correlation between the ebbs and flows of buybacks vs the market. Given we have been in a blackout period over the last few weeks, the market weakness was unsurprising. In 2025, the market is expected to set a record of $1 Trillion in repurchases.”

We should continue to manage risk accordingly, but the near-term correction since the beginning of the year is likely over for now.

This week, we will discuss the latest inflation report that supported the technical bounce in the market.

Inflation Concerns Remain Unfounded

The market has struggled over the last two weeks as bond yields have surged sharply over fears of a resurgence of inflation and tariffs under the Trump Administration. First, as a reminder, the fears of “” are likely well overstated.

“Many mainstream economists and analysts believe President Trump’s economic policies could trigger “Trumpflation.” The term refers to potential inflation driven by his administration’s fiscal and trade policies. Analysts suggest that extending the , further tax cuts, infrastructure spending, or increased military budgets will boost economic growth and lift inflation. The belief is that this fiscal stimulus, especially during an already low unemployment environment, would increase demand, leading to price increases.

Furthermore, “Trumpflation” could be triggered by introducing trade protectionism and tariffs. Economists argue that restricting imports and raising tariffs on foreign goods will lead to higher domestic prices, as the costs of imported goods would rise. Combined, these policies pointed to risks of higher consumer prices and potentially higher interest rates.

The advantage that we have today is that we can review President Trump’s first term to see if the same policies instituted then led to higher interest rates and inflation. Following his election in 2016, he instituted tariffs on China, cut taxes, and passed regulations that preceded less immigration and increased business investment. The chart below shows his first term’s economic growth, inflation, and interest rates. (Note: The chart below begins on November 1, 2016, and ends on January 20th, when President Biden took office.”

What is crucial to note is that while Trump’s policies led to more robust nominal economic growth (as measured by GDP), inflation and interest rates remained range-bound to roughly 2%. That is until the pandemic arrived in early 2020, which led to a collapse in both rates and inflation.

Could this time be different? Sure. However, given that 41% of corporate revenues are derived from international trade, anything increasing international consumers’ costs will negatively impact U.S. economic growth.

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has projected a slowdown in global growth over the next year. Tighter financial conditions, a strong dollar, tariffs, and geopolitical uncertainties will drive that decline. A cooling global economy reduces demand for raw materials and commodities, which helps keep inflation in check. Lower import prices from trading partners can also help dampen domestic inflation. The U.S. benefits from cheaper imports if major economies like China and the European Union experience slower growth. As dengan:

“Some say we will import inflation. The graph below shows inflation in the Eurozone, China, and the U.K., three of our largest trading partners. Inflation is falling alongside that of the United States. China’s inflation is near zero. Japan, not shown, has seen meager inflation with bouts of deflation for the last 25 years.”

Understanding these dynamics suggests that “Trumpflation” is likely much less of a concern than the media suggests.

Latest CPI Data Remains Contained

Secondly, the latest Consumer Price Index (CPI) showed inflationary pressures remain contained, with a strong technical bounce in the markets acknowledging this. On Wednesday, the report aligned with expectations, rising 0.4%, with coming in at just 0.2%. Here is a breakdown of the CPI report over the last five months.

Note that “housing,” the most significant contributor to the index, has declined over the last two months as real-time rental rates continue deflating in that sector.

Furthermore, medical costs (healthcare) also showed a second monthly decline. Food and Apparel showed modest increases, which is unsurprising given the holiday season, with the only outlier being transportation. However, the transportation component was impacted by both holiday travel and replacement vehicles from North Carolina and Florida floods. We will likely see continued pressure on used car prices as replacements start for the California wildfires. However, these are temporary anomalies that drag forward future consumption.

Given those inputs, inflation’s “stickiness” has been evident in recent months, putting the markets on edge about future rate cuts. However, while inflation may remain stuck here for a while longer, the eventual economic dynamics will continue to drag inflation toward the Fed’s goal of 2%. If inflation reverts to just 0.2% monthly increases, the annual inflation rate will fall to 2.4% by the end of 2025. If the economy slows further, as expected, the inflation rate will decline closer to 2%. Given that inflation is never “stable” or “sticky,” a sharper decline of inflation due to economic weakness is far more likely than a strong advance or a “new paradigm.”

Wages Are The Key

That expectation is supported by declining , which are underperforming inflation.

Given that wages are crucial for economic consumption (with spending comprising nearly 70% of GDP), the decline in wages impacts the growth rate of . The correlation between PCE and GDP is extremely high, suggesting that inflation will decline in the months ahead unless something increases incomes and household consumption rates, such as another round of stimulus checks sent directly to mailboxes.

As inflation slows, the Fed will continue to reduce interest rate policy to align interest rates with economic growth and “sticky” inflation. Such is shown in Fed Funds’ deviation above the sticky CPI rate. That reversal of interest rate policy will continue to support technical market bounces on hopes of further rate cuts in the future.

Technical Bounce Or Something More Or Less

While the debate over inflation will continue for a while longer, the market will likely continue to jump from short-term corrections to technical bounces throughout this year. As discussed in “”, higher interest rates threaten an overvalued and overly optimistic market.

With the Q4 earnings season underway, analysts are optimistic that profit growth from last year will continue this year. More notably, they expect profit growth to slow for the largest U.S. corporations but increase for the rest.

However, there may be a hitch in the optimism. As shown, interest rates are a function of economic growth and inflation. Inflation is a byproduct of economic growth. Despite falling interest rates and stable economic growth last year, the bottom 493 companies failed to grow profits strongly. With interest rates rising, it will be more difficult for smaller companies more sensitive to economic weakness to expand profit growth and earnings. Such is because higher rates negatively impact corporate earnings as borrowing costs increase. Therefore, while rising interest rates do not immediately impair earnings growth, eventually, they do as economic growth slows.

Valuations Also A Risk

Lastly, valuations are a function of earnings growth and investor sentiment. Therefore, rate increases pose a significant threat if earnings growth becomes impaired due to higher costs and slowing economic demand. Historically, rising interest rates have triggered more significant mean reverting events. This is because investors must reprice assets for lower expected earnings growth rates. With valuations at the highest level since the stimulus-induced frenzy in 2021, the risk of a reversion has increased. Such is particularly true if Wall Street’s bullish forecasts fail to become reality.

While valuations are a terrible market timing tool in the short term, they tell us much about future growth. The earnings growth rate needed to continue justifying current multiples will be much harder to achieve at current levels.

How We Are Trading It

I published our annual “” on Friday and linked it below for better investing outcomes. While you should read the entire article for full context, here are the following tenets.

To have a successful and bountiful garden, we must:

1. Prepare the soil (accumulate enough cash to build a properly diversified allocation)
2. Plant according to the season (build the allocation based on the current market cycle.)
3. Water and fertilize (add cash regularly to the portfolio for buying opportunities)
4. Weed (sell losers and laggards; weeds will eventually “choke” off the other plants)
5. Harvest (take profits regularly; otherwise, “the bounty rots on the vine”)
6. Plant again according to the season (add new investments at the right time)

Like everything in life, there is a “season” and a “cycle.” When it comes to the markets, “seasons” are dictated by the “technical and economic constructs,” and the “cycles” are dictated by “.” The seasons are shown in the chart below.

Investing in 2025 will require a blend of optimism and caution. With slowing economic growth, fiscal policy uncertainties, global challenges, overconfident sentiment, and ambitious earnings expectations, investors have plenty of reasons to approach the markets carefully. There will be a time to raise significant cash levels. A good portfolio management strategy will ensure exposure decreases and cash levels rise when the selling begins.

It is essential to take advantage of bullish advances while they last. Don’t become overly complacent, believing, “This time is different.”

It likely isn’t.